"Lokpal" is the buzz word these days in India. The second biggest buzz word is "The Civil Society". Till yesterday, I was referred to as a citizen of India. Today, I'm a member of the Civil Society. Definitely, times are changing.
This blog post aims to discuss my views and opinions, thoughts and ideas on the Jan Lokpal Bill. The views presented here are with due respects to your opinion.
In April 2011, social crusader Anna Hazare went on a fast to insist on the passing of the Lokpal Bill. The main aim of The Lokpal Bill is to provide a better legal framework to work against corrupt officials across different public organizations and in the Government.
 |
| Anna Hazare |
Taking cognizance of his fast and views, and the tremendous support that he generated across India, the Government of India has setup the Lokpal panel. It is consisting of five members of the Government and five members of the civil society. They are responsible for formulating the Lokpal Bill till 15th August 2011.
What is the Jan Lokpal Bill? Well, for people with limited knowledge of Hindi - The Jan Lokpal Bill literally means The Citizen's Ombudsman Bill.
And who exactly is an ombudsman? Since the matter has been discussed greatly in public sphere, it would be worthwhile to understand a few definitions.
Let us understand the step by step argument put forth by the proponents of the Lokpal Bill.
The proponents say that there are two mechanisms to work against corruption in the functioning of the Government and other public organizations.
Certain drawbacks are highlighted in the current mechanisms. The drawbacks highlighted are quite true and need to be addressed.
Regarding the CVC
Regarding the Departmental Vigilance Wings
Regarding the CBI
It is overburdened.
Under the control of Central Government of India.
Assumed to be unfair - since it works under orders of the Central Government.
 |
| Corruption in Judiciary |
What does the Lokpal Bill Propose?
At a face value, all these seem very promising initiatives. Most people will think that this bill will be very helpful.
However, at this moment, I would like to recollect a thought I had read somewhere – India and Indians are good at planning, poor at execution.
This thought has rumbled through my mind every time I have failed in execution. I look back only to look with awe at my plan, only to shudder at its execution.
What is my opinion?
With the Lokpal and Lokayukta, we are creating more institutions. Why not look at strengthening existing institutions? Why not look at empowering them to do the work they are supposed to do?
Let's take it step by step.
Addressing "The Lack of Resources".
Addressing "The Lack of Independence"
 |
| The Prime Minister |
Addressing "The People Question"
Let's now come to the question of the people who will be working in this anti-corruption process. The Jan Lokpal Bill suggests that these people will be elected by a transparent public participatory process.
Addressing "The Time Question"
Without doubt, the time required for execution is huge in corruption cases. This means that in many of the cases, the intent of the proceedings is lost. How do we resolve this problem?
Setup goals. The Lokpal Bill says that the Lokpal should resolve cases within one year. Well, that is ambitious in some cases while extremely liberal in some cases.
But yes, it's a good time line. Let's set the same timeline for the Vigilance Commissions. What's the harm?
Importantly, they should be empowered to execute such tasks.
Well, I may have tried to answer some of the questions which the Lokpal Bill is trying to answer. And if you have read intently till now, you might have understood my opinion.
Summarizing, I'm not in favor of creating a parallel structure for addressing the cases of corruption. Instead we should look at strengthen existing systems and frameworks to address the situation.
Most importantly, we are missing an important point here. We are looking at addressing the situation after corruption has taken place. Why don't we go a step back?
Why don't we evaluate why corruption take place? Corruption is social phenomenon and the causes of that problem need to be addressed. We should think about what causes people to be corrupt.
 |
| Example of Corruption |
Many a times, it is the limited salary offered in the job which causes people to be corrupt – because this gives them an opportunity to get that extra penny. This is a problem which should be resolved.
On a long term, India should look at creating better opportunities of work and for better equitable distribution of income. This could possibly nip the corruption in the bud.
There have been cases where the well-off people and politicians are found indulging in corruption. They need to be punished strongly so that it can serve as deterrence for occurrence of such cases in future.
Net in net, I will summarize my opinion as below
Well, different people will have different opinions. Mine might agree with yours or might be opposite to your opinion.
What do you think? What is your opinion?